What rural Batswana feel about elephants – beyond politics and ideologies

by
Simon Espley
Friday, 21 June 2019

SO, WHAT’S IT LIKE LIVING AMONGST ELEPHANTS?

I wanted to find out for myself. Debate has been heated since the Botswana government decided to resume trophy hunting and other elephant control measures. Competing vested interest groups all claim the moral and factual high ground, and the elephants have become political collateral in the process. I found myself confused, frustrated and conflicted by the dominance of binary ideologies in these debates. During this trip to Botswana I wanted to go beyond the angry rhetoric, and focus exclusively on the most important humans in this ongoing drama – those that live amongst elephants.

My travels saw me based in two communities suffering under significant ongoing human-elephant conflict – one being the eastern Panhandle area immediately north of the Okavango Delta, and the other being on the banks of the Boteti River, bordering Makgadikgadi Pans National Park. I chose not to visit that other area of major human-elephant conflict, Chobe’s Kasane area, because of the focus of mainstream media on that area, and my perception that the area is highly politicised.

 

Clockwise from left: 1) Signs have been placed at popular elephant crossing points along the well-used road connecting Seronga and various villages in the eastern Panhandle © Ecoexist; 2) An elephant crosses a fence after having visited community land bordering the Makgadikgadi Pans National Park © Elephants for Africa; 3) Elephants cross the well-used road connecting Seronga and various villages in the eastern Panhandle © Ecoexist

First though, here are five important pointers that came through clearly from the approximately 40 people that I spoke with during this mission. This was not a scientific survey, and I emphasise the local and anecdotal nature of my encounters. Some of the discussions were arranged by my hosts, and others occurred during ad-hoc encounters. My approach to each discussion was to prompt a discussion about elephants, and then to listen.

  1. None of the citizens I spoke to appeared to harbour hatred or resentment towards elephants – although there was an underlying sense of frustration and in some a fear of elephants. This does not imply that there is no anger out there, but it does provide an alternative lens to some of the talking heads unearthed by news media and vested interest groups;
  2. All of the citizens I spoke to felt that there are currently too many elephants in their community and surrounds. None wanted elephants to be removed completely, but most wanted elephants reduced in number;
  3. Without exception, citizens that I spoke to recall that elephants were rarely, if ever, encountered in their neighbourhood in the comparatively recent past, and that there were few human/elephant conflict issues back then. Elephant numbers started increasing in the mid 1990’s in the Panhandle area, and after 2010 in the Boteti River area – keep reading to find out why. They stressed that they are learning how to live with these new arrivals to their neighbourhoods;
  4. Trophy hunting was not viewed by those that I spoke to as a solution for their elephant-related problems. Many had no recollection of ever having benefited in any way from historical trophy hunting operations, but some expressed hope that the reintroduction of trophy hunting would provide some benefit to them in the future;
  5. Attacks by elephants on people happen regularly, and below I will tell you about my meeting with a survivor of one such attack. There have been numerous recent reported incidents of rural Batswana being killed by elephants and shortly before my visit to the Panhandle area, a 4-year-old boy from a village called Beetsha was killed by an elephant while out with his father, who was herding his livestock. I cannot even imagine the anguish his family must feel, and the resultant emotional scarring for the entire community. The boy’s name was Kefeletswe Barelelwang.

Ploughing fields owned by subsistence farmers in the eastern Panhandle area. Elephants navigate through these fields, as they move between the nutritious woodlands to the north and the water and grasses of the Okavango Delta to the south © Amanda Stronza, Ecoexist

PANHANDLE

It was my first evening in the eastern Panhandle area, and Graham McCulloch from The Ecoexist Project and I were staking out an elephant corridor on the well-used dirt road between Seronga and several small villages towards the east. Before long, a breeding herd of about 200 elephants scurried across the road in the dying light – a tightly-bunched herd of all ages were moving fast in the dust cloud, with curled tails and rolling eyes. “Imagine being caught in that frightening avalanche” I muttered, as the elephants eventually disappeared into the treeline south of us. “Indeed,” agreed Graham, “and this is the norm for the many people that use this road to get to school, the shops, or work. Elephants are continuously moving across this road during the months of March to when the rains arrive in October or November, between the dry deciduous woodlands to the north and the Okavango Delta to the south. As they follow timeworn migratory routes, they have to negotiate paths between fields and settlements, and cross this busy road”.

Along the way these elephants snack on crops, with devastating consequences for these subsistence farmers with no other ways of earning a living. Data from Ecoexist director Anna Songhurst’s PhD research reveals that ploughing fields less than 1km from an elephant pathway are twice as likely to be raided by elephants. This and other data extracted from 40 collared elephants are used to develop strategies to minimise elephant-human conflict, and new farming techniques are taught, to help farmers increase their yields.

Graham continues: “The incidents of elephant conflict with humans in these areas is high, and they are scared, nervous and sometimes irritable when they pass through – these are ‘fear zones’ for elephants. But, unlike the situation in poaching and trophy hunting fear zones which elephants stay away from, here they keep on crop-raiding – possibly because the risk-return equation is comparatively lower, but also because of the need to access critical resources. Elephants can be legally killed if caught in the act of crop-raiding, and of course if they attack humans. Currently about 20 elephants per annum are killed in this area, as problem animals.”

Just minutes before the herd scurried across the road we had given a lift at this specific location to two young girls that were walking to school after a weekend at home. What if they were there when the elephants crossed, I wondered?

Children walking to school along a road that sees regular elephant activity © Simon Espley

Makhata ‘Max’ Baitseng, a senior team member of Ecoexist, later explained that this block of about 8,500 km2 in northern Botswana is ideal elephant habitat, in that it includes nutritious woodland to the north of the road and water, fruits and grass to the south. Elephants are not alone here though, humans also inhabit this land, and the humans are concentrated in a narrow band of villages to the south of the block – bordering the watery Okavango Delta. The estimated 16,000 human inhabitants share this space with an estimated 18,000 elephants (estimated elephant population in 2008 was 8,905). To provide context to this density of elephants, the 20,000 km2 Kruger National Park is home to about 21,000 elephants and there are no indigenous communities in the park.

This influx of elephants after the mid 1990’s is likely due to poaching pressure in Angola, Namibia and Zambia, although Graham surmises that the elephants are also breeding well here, thanks to favourable conditions. He mentioned that the upward elephant population curve will probably flatten out when the current drought really sets in, with young elephants dying first. This is a natural process that must be allowed to occur in a healthy population such as this. But, he cautioned that incidents of human/elephant conflict will surely increase even further as competition for water and food intensifies during the drought.

LeftThe road running across the top of the Okavango Delta, from Seronga to various eastern Panhandle villages, is clearly visible in this aerial photo. Note the ploughing fields and dry woodland to the north and the watery Okavango Delta to the south © Simon Espley; RightThis graphic shows elephant movements in the Panhandle region over 4 years, based on GPS satellite tracking data from 40 collars. Note the concentration of elephants in the inverted triangle that is the eastern Panhandle © Ecoexist

Graham also explained that elephant carrying capacity in a shared landscape is all about social AND ecosystem thresholds. He continued: “We all need to recalibrate our perspectives and understand that these people are successfully living with elephants, which compete with them for water, food and space, but that this existence is a hard one. We need to develop ways to keep people and elephants safe, to mitigate incidents when they do happen, and to provide incentive for people to continue tolerating the threat to lives and livelihoods and to benefit in some way from the presence of elephants. If we do not do these things, then these areas will go the way that much of the ‘developed’ world has gone – where animals perceived by people as being dangerous are extirpated and where ecosystems are tamed and utilised for farming and recreation.”

Clockwise from top: 1) A family compound on the outskirts of Eretsha village © Simon Espley; 2) Villagers going about their daily lives © Amanda Stronza, Ecoexist; 3) Pre-school children attend classes in the Ecoexist research camp while their school in Eretsha is being built © Simon Espley; 4) Collecting firewood in the surrounding woodlands is an important chore, even for young villagers © Amanda Stronza, Ecoexist

Meet subsistence farmer Kunyima Ramosimane, who has been farming since 1988. Her tshimo (ploughing field) is 6 km from her hometown of Gunotsoga and she walks between the two – along a path that leads through mopane woodland with elephant tracks everywhere. Every year in about November (when the rains start) she plants her crop – including millet, sorghum, beans, ground nuts and water melons. Before the influx of elephants in the mid 1990’s, she used to visit and tend the crop every week or so, but these days she has to sleep at the field throughout the months of January till the harvest in April and May, to try to keep the elephants away. When the elephants arrive, often at night, she shouts and bangs a pot to try to scare them away. She is now scared of elephants because they often react aggressively when she tries to scare them away from her fields, and when she encounters them while walking in the area to forage for wood and bush fruit. This year the elephants arrived early (possibly due to the drought) and ate her entire annual crop. In a good year, she harvests enough food for her family and to sell any surplus to buy clothes and pay for school fees for her son Steven. This year, she does not know how she will get by until the next harvest. She has applied to the government for compensation, but has received nothing for the past three years. I was subsequently advised that government coffers have run dry, due to the escalation of compensation claims. As if life was not tough enough, Mma Kunyima’s chickens are dying from an unknown ailment.

Clockwise from left: 1) Subsistence farmer Kunyima Ramosimane at her home in the village of Gunotsoga. She and her family lost their entire crop to elephants this year © Simon Espley; 2) The ploughing field lies bear after elephants ate the entire crop © Simon Espley; 3) Elephants broke through the fence here, as shown to me by Isaac Seabelo, husband of subsistence farmer Kunyima Ramosimane © Simon Espley

Subsistence farmer John Mbango also lost his entire crop this year – to the drought. This long-time Gunotsoga resident told me that trophy hunting in this area was stopped in 2008 (the country-wide suspension was imposed in 2014), due to repeated bad behaviour by the professional hunters that operated the concession. He said that the tourism lodges now operating in those community areas bordering the Okavango Delta provide more permanent jobs compared to the seasonal hunting jobs, but that as a farmer he does not benefit directly from tourism. He also did not receive any direct benefits from trophy hunting at the time – pointing out that the carcasses were left far away, in remote areas, and so the meat was not accessible to people from the village. When I asked him how trophy hunting could help him and other local farmers, he said that the money needs to be enough, and go directly towards securing all ploughing fields in the area against elephants, using solar-powered electric fences.

I also met with a group of subsistence farmers in the area, and their message was similar to others – the elephants are the new arrivals and they wanted there to be fewer of them. They had all lost their crops this year – to a blend of drought and elephants. When asked about whether elephants are damaging large trees in the area, they confirmed that previously untouched neighbourhood trees like jackalberries and baobabs were now being targeted by elephants. They mentioned that elephants kill cattle once or twice a year when they compete for water and when the cattle sleep at night under camelthorn trees which elephants target for the nutritious pods. There seemed to be no grasp amongst this group of how trophy hunting could help them, or why it was seen as a solution for their problems with elephants. One wizened gentleman said that there is no system in place for trophy hunting benefits to flow down to them.

The author discusses living with elephants with a group of farmers in the town of Eretsha, Eastern Panhandle © Graham McCulloch, Ecoexist

 

Left: A baobab tree near Eretsha showing the impact of elephants seeking moisture during the dry seasons © Simon Espley; Right: The baobab tree has been coated in a mix of mud, chilli paste, neem oil and vegetable oil – to ward off elephants © Simon Espley

Later that day, Graham and I were staking out an area of ploughing fields often visited by elephants. In the dying light he explained that Ecoexist has been assisting the government to reduce conflict by consolidating ploughing fields together, called ‘cluster fields’, and to take advantage of economies of scale to erect solar-powered electric fencing and boreholes. He explained how the corridors are critical in forming part of a holistic, landscape approach that includes space to allow elephants to move through field areas and these ‘cluster fences’ that more effectively protect field areas. The approach has been working so far, but this route will require significant funding and management, and changing of generations of traditional farming practises to more sustainable ones.

During my last morning in the Panhandle area I attended a wonderful community-run village tour called “Life With Elephants”, facilitated by Ecoexist director Amanda Stronza, that focuses on educating tourists about living with elephants. A few lodges already send clients for this valuable exposure to real village life, including an ultra-luxury lodge whose guests arrive by helicopter! Guests get to visit a ploughing field, the local iron-monger and operate the manual village water pump which was installed to reduce the need to compete with elephants at the river. They also pass by a large fallen baobab tree around which the ancestors gather at night to discuss village matters in whispered conversations. The baobab fell in 2000 (without any assistance from elephants) and still lives.

My favourite part of the tour was story-telling and music in the shade of a huge rosewood (false mopane) tree. Born in Eretsha in 1942, Daniel Senwametsi tells how he regularly used to walk to Namibia in bare feet and how he used to wear animal skins, until a stint of working in the South African mines meant he could afford to buy clothes for himself and his family. He remembers seeing very few elephants before 1996, after which poaching in Angola saw them fleeing to the safety of his neighbourhood. He also worked at a luxury lodge for many years before becoming a subsistence farmer in 2004. Daniel gave a demonstration of how to behave when attacked by an elephant, a replay of when he was actually attacked while walking to his fields. His enthusiastic and animated demo had us all in stitches 🙂 . This finale of a wonderful tour takes place on the shore of what would normally at this time of year be a floodwater plain, but this year it is bone-dry because of low rains in the Angolan highlands headwaters. Daniel told me that this is the first year in his entire life of no floodwater at this time of year. The ‘Life with Elephants’ tour is an example of the kinds of elephant related enterprises that Ecoexist is facilitating that need to be promoted more to provide support and benefits to people who live with elephants.

Clockwise from left: 1) The author jams with villagers in the town of Eretsha. The instrument he is playing is known as a ‘Nyamamgwuita’ in the Simbukushu language © Graham McCulloch, Ecoexist; 2) A villager shows how to make a ‘chilli brick’ to keep elephants away. Smouldering coals are added to a dried elephant bolus and chilli seeds © Simon Espley; 3) Village elder Daniel Senwametsi  demonstrates how to behave when an elephant attacks. His amusing demo masked the serious underlying message © Simon Espley

During my stay in the Panhandle area I spent my sleeping hours at a rustic community-owned guesthouse called Sausage Tree Lodge (no known website or Facebook page) in the village of Eretsha, with meals at the nearby Ecoexist base camp.

The author’s self-catering accommodation in Eretsha village – Sausage Tree Lodge, owned by a local villager (no website or social media page) © Simon Espley

BOTETI

TO BE ATTACKED BY AN ELEPHANT

So, what’s it like to be attacked by 5-6 tons of fury, an animal capable of pushing over huge trees and casually flipping cars?

One sobering meeting for me was with a subsistence farmer who is convalescing after recently being attacked by a bull elephant. She was collecting firewood near her home town of Khumaga (Xhumaga) on the bank of the Boteti River, bordering Makgadikgadi Pans National Park. The attack was unprovoked, and the furious elephant only relented after its inert victim was covered in dust and obscured by a bush. I spent time with this dignified lady and her husband in their neat home in Khumaga, and heard her story firsthand. Her broken leg was still in plaster, and she was in obvious discomfort and pain. She did not want to be photographed or named. She is now terrified of elephants and does not see how humans and elephants can co-exist. My lasting memory of her is her brave smile and obvious determination to move on from what must surely have been a terrifying ordeal.

Clockwise from top: 1) Oxen are the go-to beasts of burden for ploughing and hauling heavy items, like these logs © Simon Espley; 2) A villager threshes millet © Amanda Stronza, Ecoexist; 3) Donkeys are a popular form of transport © Simon Espley; 4) A villager takes a moment to practice on his guitar © Amanda Stronza, Ecoexist

I spent time in this particular elephant conflict zone with community outreach officer Walona Sehularo and research assistant Thatayaone Motsentwa (TT) of Elephants for Africa, and was based at their research camp on community land on the banks of the Boteti River.

Left: The Elephants for Africa camp on the bank of the Boteti River © Simon Espley; RightThe author’s accommodation during his stay in the Boteti area, at the Elephants for Africa base © Simon Espley

Walona explained that the problem-causing elephants in this area are usually bulls, which comprise 98% of their research sightings. Again, based on current memory, elephants only arrived in the village area comparatively recently after 2010 when the Boteti River flowed again after a 20-year hiatus of no floodwater from Angola. Before then, male elephants were seen in the national park, but seldom in the neighbourhood community land. Again, local people are now having to learn how to live with elephants. Walona went on to explain that many local people tend to view wild animals as belonging to the government, and that they expect the government to control them, as farmers have to control their livestock.

Wildlife and livestock share this ecosystem © Elephants for Africa

This region has its own unique dynamic. Because of regular human/elephant conflict, the government undertook to erect a new fence between the national park and community. The fence would cut the community off from the water of the Boteti River, except for access via small pedestrian gates, and so the plan was to provide piped water. Community members with farming plots on the river bank have been advised that they will have to move their subsistence farming operations into the sandy hinterland. River plots are highly sought-after because they offer two plantings per annum – one before the rainy season of November to March and the other before the annual floodwaters from the Angolan highlands arrive during June to August. These government plans have stalled for a few years, and the locals are restless. There is in fact already a double fence line that crisscrosses the river – one being the veterinary fence that separates cattle from wildlife to abide by European beef export rules.

But both fences are mostly broken or partially removed by the authorities, with wildlife and livestock passing freely between the national park and community land. I sat at the research camp and watched livestock come and go from the national park, and elephants cross in the twilight hours to forage on community land. During one extended drive into the national park I saw many goats and cattle a few kilometres inside the park.

An elephant crosses the fence separating Makgadikgadi Pans National Park and community land © Elephants for Africa

Walona and I managed to secure a meeting with the chief of Khumaga, Kgosi Keeditse Orapeleng during a kgotla (village meeting). This respected gentleman explained via Walona as interpreter, that he and his people feel a strong connection with elephants. But, he added, life with elephants is tough, now that there are so many of them. He recalls that before the elephants arrived, life was better, and he hoped that the new fence would solve the problems caused by elephants. He also mentioned that lions also used to be a problem historically when they came from the national park to kill livestock, until trophy hunters exterminated them many years ago.

The author discusses elephants with Khumaga village Kgosi, Keeditse Orapeleng © Walona Sehularo

Meet Clifford Tekanyetso – the son of Gakeitseope, a former tourism lodge guide and now farmer, who is being helped with elephant issues by Elephants for Africa. He and his father live in Khumaga, but sleep in a tiny hut on the family field whenever there are crops to look after and protect. Clifford proudly showed me his family field, which is secured by a solar-powered electric fence – a local success story. Clifford explained that they do not lose crops to elephants any more, although vigilance is still required – just last week Clifford had to chase away an elephant that broke through the fence. In addition to an annual crop of beans, water melons, maize, millet and sorghum, they grow a summer legume known as ‘lablab’ that is dried for supplementary livestock fodder during the dry winter months.

Clockwise from left: 1) Clifford stands in amongst some of his crops on the family ploughing field © Simon Espley; 2) Clifford shows me some of his family harvest © Simon Espley; 3) Walona Sehularo of Elephants for Africa and Clifford show me the solar electric fence system © Simon Espley

One meeting that left a strong impression on me was with 60-year-old farmer Gofentsemang Johane, who has two ploughing fields – one in the dry sandy woodland and one on the bank of the Boteti River (she will lose this field in terms of the new fence plan). This determined lady has seen many growing seasons and faced many challenges in addition to the recent increase in elephant presence, and her stoic approach impressed me. She also collaborates with Elephants for Africa, and has a solar-powered electrified fence that keeps her crops safe from elephants. She burns ‘chilli bricks’ to keep elephants away. Chilli is mixed into balls with dry elephant dung, which smoulder when heated coals are placed on top – elephants do not like the pungent smoke.

Despite these measures, Gofentsemang is too afraid to sleep at her fields because of the elephants that come at night. At one stage during our chat, she fixed me with a quizzical eye and asked: “So, how will your story benefit me? Maybe it will change people’s perceptions, but here and now I really need a water pump, to increase my production from one to two harvests per year. That will make a real difference for me and my family. Will your story help me?

Clockwise from left: 1) Subsistence farmer Gofentsemang Johane chats with Walona Sehularo of Elephants for Africa and the author near the village of Khumaga © Simon Espley; 2) Tomatoes on Gofentsemang Johane’s ploughing field on the Boteti riverbank, safe behind a solar-powered electric fence © Simon Espley; 3) Gofentsemang Johane’s ploughing field on the Boteti riverbank, as seen from inside the Makgadikgadi Pans National Park © Simon Espley

SO, WHAT HAPPENS NOW?

That, dear readers, is up to you. How you react to my personal experiences with these real people depends on your ability to see the wood for the trees.

This is a story of hope, of people who are sharing their home with elephants and other wildlife.

How does this perspective differ from your own home context? Do your children face life-threatening animals on the way to school, or could wild animals eat your entire annual food supply in one raid? Perhaps those threats to lives and livelihoods were removed from your society long before your time, and you cannot recalibrate your own perspectives to appreciate the reality for these people in Botswana. Whatever your situation, these rural villagers ARE living with elephants to the best of their ability, and for that they deserve our respect. They certainly need our willingness to try to understand their daily struggles, and to change the debate from acrimonious finger pointing and threats of tourism boycotts, to finding real solutions for real problems. So that they can continue living with the largest concentrations of elephants in the world.

Keep the passion

~ Simon Espley, CEO

 

 

 

 

Clockwise from top left: 1) A healthy chilli crop – used to deter elephants from ploughing fields © Simon Espley; 2) Yoke used for oxen during ploughing © Simon Espley; 3) House walls are made from termite mound mud, supported by branches bound by strips of cattle skin © Simon Espley; 4) Reed walls (letaka) surround many village homes © Simon Espley; 5) Marula tree seeds, which contain a tiny pulp which is a source of vitamin C © Simon Espley; 6) Camelthorn tree pods, crushed and mixed with salt and crop residue as supplementary livestock feed © Simon Espley

ABOUT ECOEXIST

Ecoexist operates in the eastern Panhandle area of northern Botswana to reduce conflict and foster coexistence between elephants and people. The team finds and facilitates solutions that work for both species, by combining science with practice. Their mission is to support the lives and livelihoods of people who share space with elephants, while considering the needs of elephants and their habitats. Ecoexist works in close partnership with the Botswana Governments’ Department of Wildlife and National Parks and Department of Crop Production, as well as the communities of the eastern Panhandle. It’s supporters include The Howard G. Buffett Foundation, The GoodPlanet Foundation, USAID/WWF Namibia, USAID SAREP, and The Amarula Trust.

Clockwise from left: 1) The Ecoexist team © Amanda Stronza, Ecoexist; 2) Community engagement is an important aspect of the Ecoexist model © Amanda Stronza, Ecoexist; 3) Collaring of an elephant, in order to extract movement data © Amanda Stronza, Ecoexist

ABOUT ELEPHANTS FOR AFRICA

Elephants for Africa works towards human-wildlife coexistence in community land bordering the Makgadikgadi Pans National Park of Botswana. They take a holistic approach to human-elephant competition by understanding the social and ecological requirements of both humans and male elephants. Partnering with the communities bordering the Makgadikgadi Pans National Park and working closely with the Botswana government’s Department of Wildlife and National Parks to ensure their work addresses the needs and concerns of local and national stakeholders. Their education programs focus on developing the conservation leaders of the future and empowering local communities. Its funders include GoodPlanet Foundation, the International Elephant Foundation, The Columbus Zoo Fund for Conservation, The Memphis Zoo and Jacksonville Zoo. 

Clockwise from left: 1) Some of the Elephants for Africa team © Kate Evans, Elephants for Africa; 2) A chilli farming workshop hosted by Elephants for Africa and hosted on Tshilli Farm outside Maun © Elephants for Africa; 3) Walona Sehularo of Elephants for Africa shows elephant behaviour videos to villagers © Elephants for Africa

The author observes a large herd of elephants crossing the road connecting Seronga with various villages in the Eastern Panhandle © Graham McCulloch, Ecoexist

FLY WITH AIRLINK

Simon Espley travelled to Botswana with Airlink, who offer multi-destination flight options across southern Africa (and to Madagascar) and a convenient Lodge Link program, direct to popular lodges in the greater Kruger National Park and beyond.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR, SIMON ESPLEY

Simon Espley

Simon Espley is an African of the digital tribe, a chartered accountant and CEO of Africa Geographic. His travels in Africa are in search of wilderness, real people with interesting stories and elusive birds. He lives in Hoedspruit with his wife Lizz and two Jack Russells, and when not travelling or working he will be on his mountain bike somewhere out there. His motto is ‘Live for now, have fun, be good, tread lightly and respect others. And embrace change.’

Sign up to get our magazine stories
and most popular blog posts every week

  • Gail Potgieter

    Excellent article. Thank you, Simon, for taking the time to listen to community voices. We need a lot more journalism like this in the world. There are a few points that are touched on here, which are key to the situation.

    1) Graham McCulloch’s point about “carrying capacity” for elephants outside reserves cannot be emphasised enough. This is an important point for all areas across Africa where people live with wildlife – the biological carrying capacity must be adjusted for social carrying capacity – i.e. the level of tolerance the people living in those areas have for that species (including carnivores).

    2) Benefit flows to local communities from all forms of tourism are simply not enough in the current system. The way photographic and hunting tourism has been managed in Botswana both in the past and currently needs an overhaul, and I am hoping that will happen. Especially before the hunting is officially opened again. The juxtaposition between the self-catering, unadvertised, locally-owned camp Simon stayed in, and the high-end guests arriving by helicopter is particularly stark.

    3) While the world goes crazy about opening elephant hunting, the conservation work on the ground done by the two organisations mentioned here goes largely unheralded and under-funded. Instead of boycotting the tourism industry, people should be demanding that any concessionnaire should actively support conservation interventions like these. If every lodge in the Delta supplied the money and materials for one or two solar-powered electric fences a year, we might not have been in the current situation. Any new hunting concessionnaires should be placed under the same obligations. The current system means that most of the revenue or taxes accrue to central government, and very little makes it to community organisations. That needs to change.

    Thanks again Simon.

    • Simon Espley

      Thanks Gail, your points are all well-made and appreciated. There is no question in my mind that tourism lodges could and should get more involved in the buffer zones around protected areas, and yes for each lodge to provide protection for farmers from elephants (and lions) is surely essential if the sustainability model is to work. It would be more than one or two installations per lodge, but it should be affordable, and lodges can get their clients to sponsor installations.

    • Mike Holding

      All important points.

  • Mike Holding

    Good piece Simon. Nice to read something that’s a bit more balanced, without all the hysteria.

    • Simon Espley

      Thanks Mike, it was good to listen to these rural villagers, to really understand their daily realities and appreciate how down-to-earth and humble they are. Such a pleasant change to the angry and opportunistic rhetoric we have become used to.

      • Mike Holding

        Yes – that’s been my experience too. Sadly the Govt “consultation” managed to draw the most radical elements out, so the side the consultative committee heard was not very balanced I suspect..

  • Michael Kock

    Great article Simon and goes to the core of conservation issues related to elephant, and indeed, conservation issues elsewhere. People matter, communities need to be listened to and decisions need to be driven by Africans, be it through Government policy, research, community programs and interactions. Whether people are living outside of protected areas, or increasingly inside, they are bearing the brunt of the “wicked” problems at the wildlife-people interface. Anyhow, well done in making the effort, good reporting and the photographs tell their own stories.

    • Simon Espley

      Thanks Michael

  • Norman Doak

    Well done Simon! Far too often the armchair critics carry the discussion their way but you have done the right thing and asked the guys who are the actual sufferers and their opinions must be the real issue. Unfortunately it is a human trait to stop any activity that causes suffering to the complainant but the issue of wild animals goes beyond any group or individual and must take into account the needs and future of any species under threat in light of the need to protect and proliferate any and all such species. I just hope and pray that there will be found an amicable solution to this enlarged elephant threat and wish the folk of Botswana and other African countries every success in their endeavours to solve the problem for the benefit of all. Norman Doak.

    • Simon Espley

      Thanks Norman, I have great faith that solutions will continue to evolve, and that the great nation of Botswana will find the right way to cater for people and elephants. Amazing country with wonderful people, and historically strong leadership that has always put the wildlife economy first. Let’s see where this dynamic leads them.

  • Hallo Simon – indeed a breath of fresh air into the otherwise frequently polarized debate. I do hope the international readers will develop a far better understanding of what happens on the ground – the reality and not the fairy tale created by so many.

    You are right on two fronts – first it is up to the readers to take to heart a number of import messages you seek to portray. I do hope they listen to you.

    You are also right on a ban – a tourism ban would be ill advised. My question is if all the tourism enterprises operating in Botswana would also come out and clearly and unequivocally support your plea? – even if it means that they will then tacitly have to support the governments policy of sustainable utilization. I sincerely hope they will carefully digest what you said when they are plotting boycotts.

    Gail Potgieter made some very good points in her reply to you as did others as well – if this level of conversation can be maintained it may create enough common ground for conflicting opinion/s to move forward in greater unity – this is possible if people allow themselves to do so.

    On a lighter note – will go home now and have my brandy and coke – I am planning a 2 week overland self drive 4X4 (photographic) safari to Botswana in September – need to go and do some planning tonight. Really looking forward to it.

    • Simon Espley

      Evening Jan Harm, thanks. I have no doubt that there is enough common ground for most parties to find solutions, but I fear that ideologies get in the way. As you know, I usually klap ideological comments for a six ;-). Ja boet, nothing wrong with a Klippies and Coke, even in the morning lol. I always used to have a bottle of Amarula in the office, for those morning meetings with the team. Enjoy your Botswana self-drive – nothing as satisfying as doing your own thing.

  • Martina

    Thanks Simon for this fantastic article. I’m really torn between my love for elephants and the people. Hope that in the near future there will be a solution for both. Coming back to Botswana in Oktober it gave me a bitter tast that hunting elephants is back on the agenda. Keep on your great work for this fantacinating continent!

    • Simon Espley

      Thanks Martina, enjoy your safaris to Africa. Every country has something awesome to offer, and sadly many do offer trophy hunting.

  • Larry Patterson

    Very good article. Well balanced despite a few slight digs at trophy hunting. Your two areas were not big hunting areas, but unfortunately did host a couple of unethical hunters for a short while.
    I hope your great suggestions and comments receive enough support in the admin changes about to take place.

    • Graeme Pollock

      Larry for the average reader the subconscious anti hunting message is not apparent . Further if you have limited knowledge of the area you would assume this is a well researched article, in reality the selection of comments have been fine tuned to reject anything positive from community opinion on hunting benefits , I lived on the Boteti to river for close on 15 years , and engaged the community both from concession NG49 and Surrounds. We delivered meat until they opened up their own camps and entered into joint ventures . The fact government approved their joint venture partner even after the hunting industry wrote to them and warned them about that company is for another debate. The Boteti Again a reasonable article but the cleverly worded anti use is subtle enough . It’s clear only community and community members who did not benefit from hunting were singled out . I lived and worked with the community of NG 49 which was the only community that had a trust and elected board to negotiate joint ventures , their area is designated for CBRNM , why no discussion with experienced communities that benefited from wise use ??? O yes of course truth and unbiased reporting is not a cornerstone of Africandisney Geographic. received millions of Pula , over 100 jobs and countless benefits yet this article could not find one such beneficiary ???? . Please this is biased propaganda fed to you slowly and subconsciously.

    • Simon Espley

      Thanks Larry. Perhaps I should have edited out the comments from villagers about hunting – you know, to avoid offending that venerable industry. Interesting though that you did not acknowledge the dig from the one villager at tourism.

  • Graeme Pollock

    Again a reasonable article but the cleverly worded anti use is subtle enough . It’s clear only community and community members who did not benefit from hunting were singled out . I lived and worked with the community of NG 49 which was the only community that had a trust and elected board to negotiate joint ventures , their area is designated for CBRNM , why no discussion with experienced communities that benefited from wise use ??? O yes of course truth and unbiased reporting is not a cornerstone of Africandisney Geographic.

  • Rashid Mirmohamed

    What a pleasure making friends with good people doing good things.
    Always very enlightening.